Trying Out a Real Time Advocacy Self-Evaluation Process

It is difficult to provide specific guidance regarding what information should be shared versus what remains confidential as it is likely to be quite different for different organizations facing different contexts and pressures.

Methods of documentation, frequency of documentation, degree of detail, and approach to data synthesis and summary will likely be dependent on the unique circumstances of each advocacy organization’s context and work.

[the author] sought a flexible evaluation approach focused on asking important questions, discerning applicable learnings and thinking evaluatively to adjust or plan strategies. This approach seemed more appropriate to real time advocacy evaluation than other, more traditional evaluation approaches