Summary
The nation’s juvenile justice systems are responsible for managing youth who violate the law. These systems rely on complex financial structures and diverse funding sources shaped by the interplay of policies at the federal, state and local level. While state and local government represent the backbone of financial support to juvenile justice systems, additional funding sources — such as federal dollars, fines and fees and philanthropic contributions — also play a role.
The diversity and complexity of this landscape makes it difficult to study how different structures support — or fail to support — a specific community’s juvenile justice goals. This lack of clarity also hinders local opportunities to strategize and allocate resources effectively, improve program quality and achieve safe communities. In pursuit of a clearer picture, the Annie E. Casey Foundation funded Child Trends to conduct a mixed-methods study of juvenile justice systems’ financing across select states and localities.
Child Trends leveraged its 13 years of experience conducting the Child Welfare Financing Survey to develop a juvenile justice financing survey. This survey — administered from January 2022 to April 2023 and covering state fiscal year 2019 — covered seven states and 11 localities. It sought to better understand how individual juvenile justice systems are run and financed, what expenditures they accrue, and where they stand with savings and reinvestment practices.
In total, five potential funding sources — defined below — were included in this survey: state, local, federal and foundation funding plus funding from fines and fees.
- Local funding: Counties and other local governmental entities may allocate a portion of their budgets for juvenile justice services. These funds, derived from local taxes and other revenue sources, are frequently distributed across various local services and programs.
- State funding: States allocate financial resources to support the operations and programs of their juvenile justice systems. State priorities and legislation shape budget allocations, which are typically funded through a combination of taxes and fees.
- Federal funding: The U.S. government supports state and local juvenile justice services through grants and other funding sources. The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act and the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention provide state, Tribal, and local juvenile justice systems with the resources to develop and implement programs and evidence-based practices. These may include specialized funding programs and discretionary grants targeted at emerging challenges in juvenile justice.
- Foundation funding: Philanthropic foundations with a focus on juvenile justice provide grants and short-term support to government agencies and community-based organizations. These funds support innovative programs, research, technical assistance and evidence-based practices aimed at system transformation and improvements.
- Fines and fees: Local juvenile justice systems may impose monetary penalties on youth and their families to fund operations. These penalties can include detention and court fees, probation fees, restitution and fines for specific offenses. Although fines and fees support the costs of the system, this approach has been criticized for undermining family financial stability and increasing the likelihood of deeper justice system involvement when youth and families cannot pay.
Understanding the diverse financing structures across jurisdictions can help policymakers and system administrators identify underutilized funding streams, inform strategies within their systems and drive meaningful change in youth justice. The resources resulting from this study seek to empower data-driven, strategic decision making on this front. These documents include: