What Is Emerging Adult Justice?

Posted February 21, 2025
By the Annie E. Casey Foundation
A young man in a jean jacket layered over a gray hoodie stands against a tan wall, smiling.

Emerg­ing adult jus­tice focus­es on achiev­ing pos­i­tive out­comes for peo­ple ages 18 to 25 involved in the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem. Why focus on this age range? Nation­al­ly, peo­ple ages 18 to 25 are overrep­re­sent­ed through­out the crim­i­nal legal sys­tem and have the high­est recidi­vism rates. Too often, the jus­tice sys­tem fails to rec­og­nize or meet the devel­op­men­tal needs of this pop­u­la­tion and treats emerg­ing adults in almost the same man­ner as old­er, ful­ly mature adults.

The age of juris­dic­tion between the juve­nile and adult sys­tems has dif­fered among states over the years, but the vast major­i­ty now set it at age 18. While age 18 was once under­stood to sig­ni­fy devel­op­men­tal matu­ri­ty, recent research sug­gests that brain devel­op­ment con­tin­ues well into our 20s and that devel­op­men­tal mile­stones asso­ci­at­ed with inde­pen­dent, mature adult­hood occur well past the 18th birth­day for younger generations.

18- to 25-Year-Olds Have Dis­tinct Devel­op­men­tal Needs

The term emerg­ing adult­hood” was first intro­duced in 2000 by psy­chol­o­gist Jef­frey Jensen Arnett, who rec­og­nized a crit­i­cal devel­op­men­tal peri­od between ado­les­cence and adult­hood. Some insti­tu­tions, such as the Amer­i­can Acad­e­my of Pedi­atrics, have con­curred that there is no set demar­ca­tion line for the end of ado­les­cence. There is an exten­sive body of research on ado­les­cent brain devel­op­ment, a peri­od neu­ro­log­i­cal­ly defined as begin­ning at the start of puber­ty and extend­ing through the mid-20s.

Young peo­ple are mal­leable dur­ing this stage of life and under­go sig­nif­i­cant cog­ni­tive and social changes as they mature. To expe­ri­ence healthy, nor­ma­tive devel­op­ment, emerg­ing adults need oppor­tu­ni­ties to explore and learn, with con­sis­tent, car­ing adults to sup­port them. Most youth will desist or age out” of crime by their mid-20s because they out­grow behav­ior that puts them at high risk for expo­sure to the jus­tice sys­tem, such as high sus­cep­ti­bil­i­ty to peer influence.

Notably, although emerg­ing adults make up approx­i­mate­ly 10% of the U.S. pop­u­la­tion, they account for 19% of admis­sions into adult pris­ons nation­al­ly. They num­ber approx­i­mate­ly 300,000 based on esti­mates by the Colum­bia Uni­ver­si­ty Jus­tice Lab using mul­ti­ple sources in 2019. That year, Black and Lati­no 18- and 19-year-old males were 12 times and three times more like­ly to be impris­oned than their white peers, respec­tive­ly. For Black males ages 20 to 24, the incar­cer­a­tion rate was eight times greater than for white males of the same age, while Lati­no males were three times more like­ly to be incar­cer­at­ed than their white peers.

Record­ed dif­fer­ences in behav­ior by groups of youth does not explain these trou­bling dis­par­i­ties,” says Lael Chester, direc­tor of the Emerg­ing Adult Jus­tice Project at Colum­bia University’s Jus­tice Lab and co-author of Emerg­ing Adult Jus­tice. We need to exam­ine the jus­tice sys­tem itself and how it responds to dif­fer­ent youth, liv­ing in dif­fer­ent neigh­bor­hoods, with dif­fer­ent eco­nom­ic and social oppor­tu­ni­ties and resources.”

Under­served by the Adult Jus­tice System

Prison envi­ron­ments often cause trau­ma and func­tion as bar­ri­ers to the crit­i­cal rela­tion­ships and expe­ri­ences emerg­ing adults need to mature. The lack of devel­op­men­tal­ly ori­ent­ed prac­tices and pro­gram­ming is par­tic­u­lar­ly acute for emerg­ing adults who lacked con­nec­tions to fam­i­ly, school and com­mu­ni­ty at ear­li­er stages of their lives and/​or expe­ri­enced trau­ma. A sig­nif­i­cant num­ber of emerg­ing adults report­ed abuse at the hands of state sys­tems. Among those who were removed from the home in child­hood, 39% expe­ri­enced vio­lence and 28% expe­ri­enced abuse or neglect in the res­i­den­tial and/​or carcer­al set­tings in which they were placed. 

The grad­ual devel­op­men­tal tran­si­tion from child­hood to adult­hood makes emerg­ing adults more vul­ner­a­ble to and less cul­pa­ble for crim­i­nal behav­ior,” writes Chester. But it also makes them more amenable to pos­i­tive influ­ence, inter­ven­tion and rehabilitation.” 

Reforms Focused on Emerg­ing Adults in Jus­tice Systems 

Reforms focused on this age group are gain­ing momen­tum nation­wide. Notably, the Annie E. Casey Foun­da­tion has award­ed grants to three juris­dic­tions — Mass­a­chu­setts, Nebras­ka and Wash­ing­ton, D.C. — to help test and refine a devel­op­men­tal frame­work. This set of prin­ci­ples focus­es specif­i­cal­ly on achiev­ing pos­i­tive out­comes for peo­ple ages 18 to 25 involved in the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem. It includes shifts to prac­tices and/​or poli­cies in the fol­low­ing areas:

  1. Healthy devel­op­ment: Guide emerg­ing adults to make amends to the peo­ple they have harmed and con­tribute with civic engage­ment and volunteering.
  2. Basic needs: Assist emerg­ing adults in access­ing health care, food secu­ri­ty, hous­ing and oth­er neces­si­ties that sup­port stability.
  3. Help­ful poli­cies and prac­tices: Train pub­lic defend­ers to rep­re­sent their clients in ways that rec­og­nize and sup­port this dis­tinct devel­op­men­tal stage;
  4. Harm reduc­tion: Stop harm­ful prac­tices, such as lim­it­ed fam­i­ly con­tact and soli­tary confinement.
  5. Few­er bar­ri­ers to suc­cess: Elim­i­nate the impo­si­tion of fines and fees in courts and probation.

Read more about the juris­dic­tions test­ing the jus­tice frame­work for young adults

This post is related to: