Tips for Tapping Medicaid for Youth With Justice Involvement

Posted November 11, 2024
By the Annie E. Casey Foundation
A young man of color smiles while sitting at a desk, his hands clasped in front of him, in a bright yellow hooded sweatshirt.

Begin­ning on Jan. 1, 2025, states have new require­ments and oppor­tu­ni­ties to use Med­ic­aid fund­ing to sup­port behav­ioral and phys­i­cal health care for young peo­ple in juve­nile jus­tice facil­i­ties and adult jails. They can also use this fund­ing to sup­port con­ti­nu­ity of care when these young peo­ple return home.

States can take the fol­low­ing steps now to help pre­pare for this change:

  • Rec­og­nize which pop­u­la­tions are eli­gi­ble for the new require­ments. Deter­min­ing eli­gi­bil­i­ty may require new or strength­ened rela­tion­ships among Med­ic­aid, juve­nile jus­tice agen­cies, child wel­fare agen­cies, depart­ments of cor­rec­tions and local jails. States must pro­vide young peo­ple with behav­ioral and phys­i­cal health care if they are tran­si­tion­ing to the com­mu­ni­ty from either a juve­nile jus­tice or adult cor­rec­tion­al set­ting post-adju­di­ca­tion. In addi­tion, qual­i­fy­ing young peo­ple must be: 
    1. eli­gi­ble for the Children’s Health Insur­ance Pro­gram (CHIP) and younger than 19;
    2. eli­gi­ble for Med­ic­aid and younger than 21; or
    3. for­mer fos­ter care youth under age 26.
  • Eval­u­ate cur­rent Med­ic­aid assess­ment, sus­pen­sion, enroll­ment and ser­vice capac­i­ty. States should improve process­es relat­ed to Med­ic­aid cov­er­age for youth who have been incar­cer­at­ed. This effort includes equip­ping sys­tems to sus­pend eli­gi­bil­i­ty or ben­e­fits tem­porar­i­ly, rede­ter­min­ing eli­gi­bil­i­ty with­out requir­ing new appli­ca­tions and restor­ing cov­er­age upon release. Many state Med­ic­aid agen­cies have devel­oped some, but not all, of these oper­a­tional and tech­ni­cal processes.
  • Assess data-shar­ing capa­bil­i­ties and capac­i­ty.State agen­cies may need to expand their data-shar­ing efforts to facil­i­tate enroll­ment and con­nec­tions to care upon release. Some states may need to devel­op mem­o­ran­da of under­stand­ing in addi­tion to imple­ment­ing new or updat­ed process­es and pro­to­cols for cross-agency data exchange.
  • Iden­ti­fy and engage key part­ners. States should move now to iden­ti­fy and engage essen­tial col­lab­o­ra­tive part­ners. The new require­ments to pro­vide tar­get­ed case man­age­ment ser­vices 30 days pri­or to release and for at least 30 days after release mean that states must know what com­mu­ni­ty-based part­ner­ships exist and what case man­age­ment ser­vices they can provide.
  • Set imple­men­ta­tion pri­or­i­ties. Sequenc­ing will be impor­tant. States should con­sid­er a phased imple­men­ta­tion approach that starts with incar­cer­a­tion set­tings where rel­a­tive­ly large num­bers of youth are eli­gi­ble for care.
  • Con­sid­er apply­ing for fed­er­al capac­i­ty-build­ing fund­ing. On Sept. 27, 2024, the Cen­ters for Medicare and Med­ic­aid Ser­vices released a com­pet­i­tive appli­ca­tion for state capac­i­ty grants. It plans to award up to 56 grants of between $1 mil­lion and $5 mil­lion each. Both Med­ic­aid and CHIP agen­cies in states and ter­ri­to­ries can use these plan­ning grants to help states meet the new statu­to­ry require­ments. States can also pur­sue Med­ic­aid 1115 waivers for tech­nol­o­gy enhance­ments and data shar­ing linkages.

The steps, devel­oped by the Cen­ter for Health Care Strate­gies with sup­port from the Annie E. Casey Foun­da­tion, appear in a 22-page report, New Med­ic­aid Oppor­tu­ni­ties to Sup­port Youth Leav­ing Incar­cer­a­tion. This report spot­lights efforts in New Hamp­shire, New Jer­sey, New Mex­i­co, Ore­gon and Utah as exam­ples of how states are align­ing Med­ic­aid fund­ing with broad­er com­mu­ni­ty and pub­lic safe­ty goals. Its authors have also pro­duced a relat­ed five-page pol­i­cy cheat sheet.

Joe Rib­sam, the Casey Foundation’s direc­tor of Child Wel­fare and Juve­nile Jus­tice Pol­i­cy, urges juris­dic­tions to lever­age this fund­ing to build more com­pre­hen­sive con­tin­ua or sys­tems of care so young peo­ple can get the help they need with­out the neg­a­tive con­se­quences of jus­tice sys­tem involve­ment, such as a crim­i­nal record.” He not­ed, States can be strate­gic about bring­ing togeth­er sys­tem part­ners, includ­ing Med­ic­aid agen­cies, around a shared vision for fam­i­ly and com­mu­ni­ty well-being.”