Stronger Kinship Diversion Policies Are Needed to Support Children and Caregivers

Posted July 15, 2024
By the Annie E. Casey Foundation
A young black childre kisses her older black gradmother on the cheek; the grandmother is smiling broadly.

Most child wel­fare agen­cies facil­i­tate kin­ship care­giv­ing arrange­ments — when rel­a­tives step up to raise chil­dren when their par­ents can’t care for them — with­out mov­ing a child into state cus­tody and for­mal fos­ter care. Known as kin­ship diver­sion, it is a com­mon prac­tice used to keep chil­dren out of fos­ter care. Yet, many states that allow the inter­ven­tion lack poli­cies that would help ensure children’s safe­ty, par­ents’ legal rights and kin­ship care­givers’ abil­i­ty to pro­vide ade­quate care.

New Insights on State Kin­ship Diver­sion Poli­cies high­lights find­ings from a 2022 sur­vey of child wel­fare admin­is­tra­tors in which juris­dic­tions report­ed on their poli­cies for cre­at­ing, over­see­ing and track­ing diver­sion arrange­ments. It is the lat­est report in the Annie E. Casey Foundation’s Fam­i­ly Ties: Analy­sis From a State-by-State Sur­vey of Kin­ship Care Poli­cies series.

The sur­vey, con­duct­ed by Child Trends at the request of the Casey Foun­da­tion, includ­ed all 50 states, Wash­ing­ton, D.C., and Puer­to Rico. Agen­cies also report­ed on the resources they made avail­able for chil­dren and kin­ship care­givers in diver­sion arrangements.

Down­load the Report

Fam­i­lies should have the abil­i­ty to make arrange­ments with kin for the care of their chil­dren at a moment of cri­sis or stress, in safe and sup­port­ed ways that make sense for them — as fam­i­lies have done for ages,” New Insights states. They should be free to do so with­out unnec­es­sary gov­ern­ment inter­ven­tion.” The report main­tains that when a child wel­fare agency steps in to facil­i­tate this type of arrange­ment, the agency has a unique respon­si­bil­i­ty to ensure, at a minimum:

  • par­ents and care­givers are informed of the options in their juris­dic­tion and are the ulti­mate deci­sion-mak­ers about arrange­ments that divert chil­dren from fos­ter care;
  • chil­dren are safe; and
  • kin­ship care­givers and chil­dren in their care have the resources they need.

It’s crit­i­cal for the field to clar­i­fy the appro­pri­ate role of gov­ern­ment when car­ing for chil­dren who must tem­porar­i­ly or per­ma­nent­ly reside with kin,” said Todd Lloyd, senior asso­ciate for Child Wel­fare Pol­i­cy at the Foun­da­tion. Stronger pub­lic pol­i­cy is need­ed to spur best practices.”

Key Find­ings of New Insights on State Kin­ship Diver­sion Policies

New Insights con­firms that kin­ship diver­sion takes many forms, including:

  • doc­u­ment­ed and sup­port­ed with resources;
  • arranged with par­ents’ full con­sent; and
  • decid­ed by a child wel­fare agency.

Because states define and prac­tice kin­ship diver­sion dif­fer­ent­ly and because there are no fed­er­al report­ing require­ments on diver­sion prac­tices, the child wel­fare field lacks impor­tant data to explain how well diver­sion prac­tices meet these responsibilities.

The report’s find­ings advance the field’s under­stand­ing of diver­sion inter­ven­tions for which lim­it­ed data have been pub­licly avail­able. It shares that:

  • Only 15 juris­dic­tions that allow kin­ship diver­sion required child wel­fare agen­cies to pro­vide direct assis­tance and resources to the kin­ship care­givers. In most states, chil­dren and care­givers in kin­ship diver­sion arrange­ments have sig­nif­i­cant­ly less access to ser­vices and finan­cial sup­port than those in licensed or unli­censed kin­ship care place­ments, in which the chil­dren are in the cus­tody of the child wel­fare agency.
  • Only one-third of states with kin­ship diver­sion poli­cies grant­ed par­ents the final deci­sion-mak­ing author­i­ty in these arrange­ments. In oth­er states, a child wel­fare agency may sep­a­rate a child from par­ents and direct the kin­ship place­ment with­out court over­sight and time lim­its for place­ments that come with for­mal­ly tak­ing the child into state custody.
  • Agency involve­ment in kin­ship diver­sion arrange­ments var­ied dra­mat­i­cal­ly by juris­dic­tion. Some states required the agency to inves­ti­gate, open a case, mon­i­tor or set time lim­its for kin­ship diver­sion place­ments. Only two states required court over­sight in these arrangements.
  • Although almost half of the states that allow kin­ship diver­sion report­ed that they track diver­sion arrange­ments. Few col­lect­ed data that would enable them to report pub­licly how many chil­dren have been divert­ed or their out­comes; how many reuni­fy with their par­ents; and how many of these kin­ship arrange­ments receive assis­tance, sup­port or mon­i­tor­ing from the agencies.

Clear pol­i­cy gaps exist across all states when it comes to ensur­ing chil­dren, their par­ents and kin­ship care­givers are ade­quate­ly pro­tect­ed, informed and resourced. The sur­vey reveals how inequitably chil­dren and kin care­givers are being treat­ed in diver­sion arrange­ments, which should be unac­cept­able,” said Lloyd.

A Kin­ship Diver­sion Call to Action

The report calls on fed­er­al, state and com­mu­ni­ty lead­ers to exam­ine their cur­rent kin­ship diver­sion prac­tices and poli­cies in col­lab­o­ra­tion with kin­ship care­givers to deter­mine the following:

  • Are par­ents and care­givers ful­ly informed of the impli­ca­tions and poten­tial length of these arrange­ments, their rights and any avail­able ser­vices to help them toward reunification?
  • Do par­ents have the ulti­mate author­i­ty regard­ing the place­ment of their child?
  • What mech­a­nisms are in place to ensure chil­dren in kin­ship diver­sion arrange­ments are pro­tect­ed from harm, such as back­ground checks on poten­tial care­givers and reg­u­lar monitoring?
  • How are kin­ship care­givers sup­port­ed with finan­cial assis­tance, health care access, edu­ca­tion and oth­er vital services?
  • Do child wel­fare agen­cies have the tools and capac­i­ty for ade­quate data col­lec­tion and analy­sis to deter­mine the out­comes of kin­ship diver­sion for chil­dren, care­givers and parents?
  • Are kin­ship diver­sion arrange­ments offered equi­tably as an alter­na­tive to fos­ter care?

Child wel­fare agen­cies are uti­liz­ing kin­ship care because con­nec­tions to fam­i­ly pro­vide chil­dren and youth sta­bil­i­ty, belong­ing, com­mu­ni­ty and cul­ture,” said Leslie Gross, direc­tor of the Foundation’s Fam­i­ly Well-Being Strat­e­gy Group. States increas­ing­ly rely on rel­a­tives and fam­i­ly friends to step up in times of need, so we must strength­en poli­cies, prac­tices and over­sight to ensure chil­dren, youth and their fam­i­lies receive the resources and sup­ports they need to thrive.”

Explore more Casey Foun­da­tion resources on kin­ship care:

What is kin­ship care?

Unlock­ing fos­ter care licens­ing for more kin­ship caregivers

This post is related to:

This post is part of the series: