Child Poverty Rates Remained High in 2023: At Least 10 Million Kids in Poverty

Updated September 30, 2024 | Posted September 20, 2021
By the Annie E. Casey Foundation
Child on swing with mom pushing her

The U.S. Cen­sus Bureau recent­ly released the updat­ed 2023 mea­sures of pover­ty: the offi­cial pover­ty mea­sure and the Sup­ple­men­tal Pover­ty Mea­sure (SPM).

In 2022, the offi­cial pover­ty mea­sure thresh­old was $29,678 for a fam­i­ly of two adults and two chil­dren. Fam­i­lies can earn well over this amount and still not make ends meet, espe­cial­ly in high-cost areas. Unlike the offi­cial pover­ty mea­sure, the SPM fac­tors in region­al vari­a­tion in cost of liv­ing. For all these rea­sons, the Annie E. Casey Foun­da­tion advo­cates using the SPM.

How Are the Two Mea­sures Different?

  • Offi­cial pover­ty mea­sure: Only con­sid­ers pre-tax cash income and uses nation­al thresh­olds based on house­hold com­po­si­tion that are infla­tion-adjust­ed. Remain­ing large­ly unchanged since the 1960s, it offers con­sis­tent mea­sure­ment over time. In 2023, the offi­cial pover­ty thresh­old was $30,900 for a fam­i­ly of two adults and two chil­dren. Fam­i­lies can earn well over this amount and still not make ends meet, espe­cial­ly in high-cost areas.
  • SPM: Con­sid­ers both cash income and pay­roll tax­es, as well as non­cash earn­ings such as safe­ty net ben­e­fits and tax cred­its, and sub­tracts nec­es­sary expens­es (e.g., med­ical costs). The SPM also uses geo­graph­i­cal­ly-adjust­ed pover­ty thresh­olds to account for region­al vari­a­tion in cost of liv­ing. First released in 2011, this mea­sure improves with new data and meth­ods over time.

By account­ing for non­cash ben­e­fits and tax cred­its, the SPM allows experts to bet­ter assess the effec­tive­ness of inter­ven­tions to reduce child pover­ty. Giv­en this and the oth­er SPM strengths not­ed above, the Annie E. Casey Foun­da­tion advo­cates for using this more com­pre­hen­sive mea­sure of child poverty.

Read more about the dif­fer­ences between the offi­cial pover­ty mea­sure and the SPM.

What Is the Cur­rent Child Pover­ty Rate in the Unit­ed States?

Sup­ple­men­tal Pover­ty Mea­sure (SPM)

About one in sev­en (14%) kids are in pover­ty, accord­ing to the 2023 SPM.

The 2023 SPM child pover­ty rate is up 2 per­cent­age points from 2022 and remains sub­stan­tial­ly high­er than its record low of 5% in 2021. This means that about 10 mil­lion kids in 2023 were liv­ing in house­holds that did not have enough resources for basic needs such as food, hous­ing and utilities.

See the SPM child pover­ty rate in your state

The high­est rates of pover­ty gen­er­al­ly occur for the youngest chil­dren — under age 5 — kids in sin­gle-moth­er fam­i­lies, chil­dren of col­or and kids in immi­grant families.

Sign up for newslet­ters to get the lat­est data, reports and resources from the Casey Foundation

Offi­cial Pover­ty Measure

The offi­cial child pover­ty rate, which does not take into account fam­i­lies’ non-cash resources and oth­er fac­tors not­ed above, is high­er than the SPM, with 16% of all U.S. chil­dren liv­ing below the pover­ty line in 2023. This equates to about 11.4 mil­lion kids total. Accord­ing to the Cen­sus Bureau, the offi­cial child pover­ty rate is sig­nif­i­cant­ly high­er than the rate for the U.S. pop­u­la­tion as a whole (12.5% in 2023).

In the last decade, the share of chil­dren liv­ing in pover­ty peaked at 23% in 2011 and 2012, but has declined since then. In 2022 and 2023, this rate held steady at 16%.

The Effects and Cost of Child Poverty

Grow­ing up in pover­ty is one of the great­est threats to healthy child devel­op­ment. The effects of eco­nom­ic hard­ship, par­tic­u­lar­ly deep and per­sis­tent pover­ty, can dis­rupt children’s cog­ni­tive devel­op­ment, phys­i­cal and men­tal health, edu­ca­tion­al suc­cess and oth­er aspects of life. These effects rever­ber­ate through­out adult­hood. Researchers esti­mate the total U.S. cost of child pover­ty ranges from $500 bil­lion to $1 tril­lion per year based on lost pro­duc­tiv­i­ty and increased health care and oth­er expenditures.

The rise in the SPM child pover­ty rate in 2023 con­tin­ues a trend from 2022 in which mil­lions of chil­dren fell back into pover­ty. The health and well-being of these chil­dren remains at risk. Now more than ever, as the nation is just recov­er­ing from the COVID-19 pan­dem­ic and result­ing eco­nom­ic cri­sis, chil­dren need secu­ri­ty and sta­bil­i­ty. Deci­sions by pol­i­cy­mak­ers today will have last­ing impacts on young people’s lives — impacts that will affect our country’s future work­force, econ­o­my, elec­tions and more.

What Is the Main Cause of Child Poverty?

Child pover­ty is con­nect­ed to fam­i­ly pover­ty. While there is no sin­gle cause of pover­ty, fam­i­lies may fall into finan­cial hard­ship due to a job loss, expens­es that become too high — such as hous­ing, health care and gro­ceries — a tran­si­tion from a two-par­ent to a sin­gle-par­ent house­hold or anoth­er desta­bi­liz­ing event. Among chil­dren and fam­i­lies of col­or, the pic­ture is fur­ther com­pli­cat­ed by gen­er­a­tions-long inequities and dis­crim­i­na­to­ry poli­cies and prac­tices that have led to income inequal­i­ty and dis­parate access to eco­nom­ic oppor­tu­ni­ties and resources.

Neigh­bor­hoods mat­ter, too. Com­mu­ni­ties with con­cen­trat­ed pover­ty, which are often racial­ly seg­re­gat­ed, tend to have few­er job oppor­tu­ni­ties for par­ents and youth, under­fund­ed schools and few­er resources in gen­er­al. When chil­dren grow up in these neigh­bor­hoods, it can take gen­er­a­tions to move out of poverty.

Addi­tion­al­ly, larg­er eco­nom­ic forces, labor mar­kets and pub­lic poli­cies affect child pover­ty. For instance, parental unem­ploy­ment and child pover­ty increase dur­ing eco­nom­ic reces­sions, and labor mar­ket fac­tors — such as min­i­mum wage lev­els — affect pover­ty rates.

Demo­graph­ics play a role as well, with old­er, more edu­cat­ed par­ents gen­er­al­ly able to obtain high­er wages. Child pover­ty rates are also affect­ed by the strength of gov­ern­ment safe­ty net pro­grams, such as the extend­ed child tax cred­it dis­cussed below.

Where Does Child Pover­ty in Amer­i­ca Exist?

Every state in Amer­i­ca has chil­dren liv­ing in pover­ty, but high­er rates gen­er­al­ly exist in the south­ern region of the coun­try (see map below) as well as in rur­al areas and urban neigh­bor­hoods of con­cen­trat­ed poverty.

Pover­ty in Amer­i­ca Dis­pro­por­tion­ate­ly Affects Chil­dren of Color

For decades, chil­dren and fam­i­lies of col­or have borne a dis­pro­por­tion­ate bur­den of pover­ty in the Unit­ed States, and the lat­est Cen­sus SPM pover­ty data show a con­tin­u­a­tion of this sober­ing trend. 

  • Lati­no chil­dren: More than 1 in 5 (22%) now live in pover­ty accord­ing to the 2023 SPM, an increase from 20% in 2022.
  • Black chil­dren: The pover­ty rate also rose by 2 per­cent­age points for this group, from 18% in 2022 to 20% in 2023.
  • Two or more races: The SPM pover­ty rate inched up from 12% to 13% for these children.
  • Asian and Pacif­ic Islander chil­dren: The largest increase occurred for this group, with the pover­ty rate ris­ing from 10% to 14%. How­ev­er, the cat­e­go­ry of​“Asian and Pacif­ic Islander” rep­re­sents dozens of high­ly diverse pop­u­la­tions, and dis­ag­gre­gat­ed data from oth­er indi­ca­tors show that wide socioe­co­nom­ic dis­par­i­ties per­sist among these dif­fer­ent pop­u­la­tions.
  • White chil­dren: This group has the low­est pover­ty rate, at 7%, and the rate did not change from 2022 to 2023

Sim­i­lar to the SPM, the offi­cial child pover­ty rate reflects per­sis­tent inequities for chil­dren of col­or. For instance:

  • Amer­i­can Indi­an or Alas­ka Native chil­dren: The offi­cial pover­ty rate for these chil­dren was an alarm­ing 27% in 2023, although it is down slight­ly from 29% in 2022. (The SPM rate for this pop­u­la­tion was con­sid­ered unre­li­able due to a large mar­gin of error.)

Also see 2023 offi­cial child pover­ty rates on the KIDS COUNT® Data Cen­ter by:

How to Reduce Child Pover­ty in America

Ade­quate­ly invest­ing in safe­ty net pro­grams — par­tic­u­lar­ly the expand­ed child tax cred­it — is one of the most effec­tive ways to reduce child pover­ty. Accord­ing to the Cen­sus Bureau, in 2021, expand­ed tax cred­its and stim­u­lus pay­ments lift­ed more than 5 mil­lion chil­dren out of pover­ty. That year, the nation was look­ing at a pol­i­cy suc­cess sto­ry: America’s SPM child pover­ty rate had dropped by half, from 10% in 2020 to a his­toric low of 5%. The Cen­sus Bureau report­ed that the 2021 expand­ed child tax cred­it (CTC) alone removed 2.9 mil­lion kids from pover­ty, one-third of whom were under age 6. The expand­ed CTC also helped to reduce racial and eth­nic dis­par­i­ties in child pover­ty. These poli­cies clear­ly worked.

How­ev­er, the expand­ed tax cred­its and pay­ments were tem­po­rary pan­dem­ic-relief mea­sures, and when they expired in 2022, the num­ber of kids in pover­ty soared.

Look­ing For­ward: Expand the Child Tax Credit

Impor­tant evi­dence was gath­ered from the 2021 CTC expan­sion. In addi­tion to lift­ing mil­lions of kids out of pover­ty, this pan­dem­ic-era pol­i­cy cor­rect­ed a prob­lem in the exist­ing CTC that allowed high-income fam­i­lies to receive the full tax cred­it while pre­vent­ing low-income fam­i­lies from receiv­ing the same. In oth­er words, fam­i­lies with the great­est needs received the least assis­tance. Since the expand­ed CTC expired, the full cred­it is no longer avail­able to all low-income families.

Dra­mat­i­cal­ly reduc­ing child pover­ty in Amer­i­ca is an achiev­able pol­i­cy goal. Nat­u­ral­ly, the tem­po­rary pan­dem­ic relief mea­sures were not meant to be long-term poli­cies. But now that we know what works to reduce child pover­ty, law­mak­ers can move for­ward with con­fi­dence to imple­ment effec­tive, last­ing solu­tions. Strong safe­ty net pro­grams are essen­tial to ensur­ing that all chil­dren have equi­table access to the oppor­tu­ni­ties and resources they need to thrive.

Pol­i­cy­mak­ers should pri­or­i­tize expand­ing the child tax cred­it, strength­en­ing oth­er safe­ty net pro­grams to meet the basic needs of all low-income chil­dren and address­ing root caus­es of income inequal­i­ty and pover­ty dis­par­i­ties by race.

Access More of the Foundation’s Child and Fam­i­ly Pover­ty Resources

This post is related to:

Popular Posts

View all blog posts   |   Browse Topics